![]() ![]() I can assure you it provides the exact tools for you to play back media content. ![]() At a first glance, it seems quite simple, but that does not mean that it cannot serve you well or that it lacks major functionalities. What can I say? I was charmed by its modern design, addressed to the users for whom also the looks matter. So, in my search for the one player that would best satisfy all my needs I've bumped into a wide pallet of such applications: Amarok (only audio), Beep Media Player, MPlayer, SMPlayer, VLC player (my old "friend" that I was using also on Windows, really good for movies, very simple and predictable in the sense that I can easily figure out what I have to do without getting dizzy by the sophisticated functionalities names), Audacious, KMPlayer RealPlayer and so on. I am sure that these are good too and they offer almost the same functionalities as the others (after all, they all are media players) but, there are some that just do it better, or I just like better the way they do it. If you're a more pretentious user, such as I am when it comes about players, then you just cannot limit yourself to your Linux distribution's suggestion. ![]() How do you think things work when it comes to media players? Yes, you're right, exactly the same. Supposing that you want to surf the web, Mozilla, Opera, Konqueror and others are waiting for you to make a choice same goes if you want to edit some documents, where applications such as AbiWord Text Processor, OpenOffice Word Processor or Kword compete in becoming your favorite editor. This situation is familiar to most computer users who nowadays have plenty of solutions to any of their needs or desires. It is well-known that the hardest choice is made when you deal with a varied offer, in which every item is said to be the best. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |